Phobos licensing

[Anders F Björklund]

Walter Bright wrote:

>> But it's jumping the gun because I suspect Matthew Wilson might be 
>> willing to change the license.  At least I'm guessing so, because 
>> std.openrj is also by him, and it has a reasonable license.
> 
> If someone wants to take the lead on this, and either ask Matthew to 
> change the license, or replace those modules, I'll be happy with either. 
> As it stands, none of them are lynchpins of Phobos, and can be simply 
> dropped without affecting the rest.

AFAIK, Matthew *did* change the license on those, and GDC followed this.
Not sure about std.openrj, but definitely so with registry and loader...

See DMD Bug #321: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=321
and Wiki4D: http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?PhobosLicenseIssues

--anders