Do we need a time-out in D evolution?

[BCS]

Reply to Walter,

> Johan Granberg wrote:
> 
>> Didn't Walter say that he would branch the compiler into a current
>> stable (what we have now) and an experimental 2.0  compiler. If that
>> is done isn't that a clear signal to everyone that the 1.014 (or
>> whatewer the version is at the moment) compiler is the one to use for
>> production code?
>> 
> It's getting pretty clear to me that the 1.0 series won't get any new
> features, just bug fixes, as the recent 1.015 release suggests.
> 
> The new features will all go into the 2.0 series.
> 

will the 2.0 series have an extern(D1) if and when somthing breaks linking?