Do we need a time-out in D evolution?
Jarrett Billingsley
kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com
Sun Jun 10 18:11:58 PDT 2007
"Dave" <Dave_member at pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:f4i50m$2ct5$1 at digitalmars.com...
> OTOH, since 'mutable by default' has been done ad nauseum for imperative
> languages, and the above is really an onerous list to try and compete
> against for mind-share, maybe D 2.0 _should_ try 'const by default'.
Which is one of my big reasons for giving it a shot. It's just time to try
something different.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list