Implicit template properties

[Frits van Bommel]

Neal Becker wrote:
> I'm reading D specification, and I found:
> "If a template has exactly one member in it, and the name of that member is
> the same...".
> 
> That strikes me as strange.  It seems reasonable to use the name as a
> trigger for the Implicit template property feature, but what is the reason
> for the restriction to 'exactly one member'?

Because the other names otherwise wouldn't be (externally) accessible 
any more, I guess.
Though that reason only applies when the others aren't private[1], which 
is why there have been suggestions to change this rule to "one _public_ 
member" instead of "one member"...


[1]: I'm not sure if private template members are accessible from the 
rest of the module they're declared in, like class & struct members. If 
they are, that might screw things up.