struct vs. class

[Hasan Aljudy]

Martin wrote:
> C++ does that by using virtual vs. the
> default and pointers/references vs. values with all the associated
> problems but there might be a cleaner and nicer way without having to
> give up the flexibility.

That is why C++ sucks.

I actually like the D solution .. specially having used Java before .. a 
language with NOTHING other than classes!! and C++ .. a language without 
"real" classes.

D has the best "in the middle" solution.