Poll: are you using D2.0?

[S.]

No, but I would be if tango supported it.

Bill Baxter Wrote:

> Bill Baxter wrote:
> > Just curious how many folks are actually using D2.x already.
> > Reply here, or if you'd like to keep the noise on the NG down, just 
> > respond with this no-reg-required poll:
> > 
> >    http://www.billbaxter.com/tmp/d2poll.html
> 
> Here's a summary of the poll results:
> 
> -------------------------------
>  From the web poll:
> Yes: 28  No: 87
> 
>  From replies here:
> Yes: ~6  No: ~13
> 
> Totals:
> Yes:  34/134 = 25%
> No:  100/134 = 75%
> 
> --------------------------------
> Comments from the webpoll:
> 
> problems with installing both version in one system
> 
> Don't really need anything from d2. Const maybe, but it's apparently not 
> ready yet.
> 
> until tango works with D2.0 I stay with 1.0
> 
> tango only for 1.0
> 
> See NG posts about tango and const
> 
> D1. Too many announced code-breaking future changes are yet to happen.
> 
> I'm using version 1 becasue of Tango compatibility
> 
> I was using it, but decided to wait for the const changes to go through.	
> 
> I actually (for the most part) like the new const, and the new invariant 
> is what pulled me over for a couple of my projects.
> 
> I'm use D 1.0 with tango in a small real world project, and would expand 
> the usage if this time D prove itself.
> 
> 
> Waiting for the const issues to be resolved properly
> 
> not as stable (both implementation and spec).
> 
> working with multiple guys i cannot live without const
> 
> Bud will compile on either
> 
> I'm waiting for it to stabilize.
> 
> first! 0ffh =) [btw. drat compiles with D2.005, i suppose i'll have to 
> update it for 2.006)
> 
> I'm waiting for const to be settled
> 
> 
> ---------------------------
> My summary:
> Looks like the main reasons for not going to 2.0 are
> * Tango
> * waiting for const to be settled
> * generally waiting for more "stability"
> 
> --bb