opStar

[Walter Bright]

Bill Baxter wrote:
> If you're not going to be able to access members and such via the 
> opStar, why not just have iterators use a convention like p.val to 
> access the value pointed too, rather than *p.  Why does it need to be an 
> operator?

Because raw pointers don't have a .value property, and can't because 
then you'd have problems with pointers to structs that have a value member.