toString vs. toUtf8
Jarrett Billingsley
kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 19 13:55:42 PST 2007
"Sean Kelly" <sean at f4.ca> wrote in message
news:fhsts6$5nn$1 at digitalmars.com...
>
> As an alternative, I can only suggest that toUTF8, toUTF16, and toUTF32 be
> named toString, toWString, and toDString, respectively, and Unicode should
> be assumed as the standard encoding format in D.
>
Do you want to know my single overriding reason for wanting toString instead
of toUtf8? Because it's nicer-looking and easier to type.
My other reasons include consistency (Java uses .toString, .Net uses
.ToString, phobos uses .toString) and that "toUtf8" screams "I'm a string
class and this method converts my encoding!" while "toString" says "convert
this object, whatever it is, to some kind of string."
votes += 8 for toString, toWString, and toDString.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list