toString vs. toUtf8
Kris
foo at bar.com
Mon Nov 19 21:38:40 PST 2007
"Sean Kelly" <sean at f4.ca> wrote in message
[snip]
>> Don't know if that hurts your eyes less or not, but it seems more
>> consistent with Tango's existing naming convention to me than toWString,
>> etc.
>
> Yeah I was thinking the same thing. It's certainly easier for me to read
> than the other form.
Bill: actually, toString, toStringW and toStringD are more consistent with
themselves, and with Tango convention. Even toString, toString16 and
toString32 are significantly more style-consistent than toWString and
toWstring
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list