toString vs. toUtf8

Kris foo at bar.com
Mon Nov 19 21:38:40 PST 2007


"Sean Kelly" <sean at f4.ca> wrote in message
[snip]
>> Don't know if that hurts your eyes less or not, but it seems more 
>> consistent with Tango's existing naming convention to me than toWString, 
>> etc.
>
> Yeah I was thinking the same thing.  It's certainly easier for me to read 
> than the other form.


Bill: actually, toString, toStringW and toStringD are more consistent with 
themselves, and with Tango convention. Even toString, toString16 and 
toString32 are significantly more style-consistent than toWString and 
toWstring 





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list