toString vs. toUtf8
Bill Baxter
dnewsgroup at billbaxter.com
Tue Nov 20 15:51:24 PST 2007
Sean Kelly wrote:
> As an alternative, I can only suggest that toUTF8, toUTF16, and toUTF32
> be named toString, toWString, and toDString, respectively, and Unicode
> should be assumed as the standard encoding format in D.
1) On the question of toWString vs toWstring and consistency:
I don't think there's any clear precedent for either in Tango right now,
but my question is, if tango *had* a "to uint" function, what would it
be named? toUInt or toUint? Whatever the answer to that is should be
the same as the answer to how to name a "to wstring" function.
2) On the question of toWString vs toStringW
It seems to be pretty well agreed in this thread that toWString is more
consistent but toStringW is prettier.
I could be wrong but I think usage pattern of these W and D variants of
the functions will be bimodal: either very frequent or very infrequent.
In the former case I'd probably want to make a simpler alias like
'wstr'. In the latter case I'd want it to be the most consistent thing
possible to be easy to remember for the few times I use it.
--bb
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list