Phango - questions

[Aarti_pl]

Aarti_pl pisze:
> Don Clugston pisze:
>> Personally, parts of Tango's structure are a bit too deep for my 
>> liking. (I don't think frequently used stuff should be more that a 
>> couple of levels deep;
>> I hope I never have to use tango.net.cluster.tina.util.model.IServer; 
>> I think tango.util.collection.HashMap is way too much to type for 
>> something so fundamental). But it has room to expand.
>>
> 
> Yup. First one is definitely too deep.
> 
> In case of second one I really don't like Java approach of putting 
> collections into util package. IMHO collections are too fundamental in 
> language for being threated just as part of util. It would be much nicer 
> to have:
> 
> tango.collection
> 
> package instead.
> 

And:

tango.util.time --> tango.time
tango.util.Convert --> tango.convert.Convert

(after quick look into tango.util).

Above are too fundamental to exist in util. These are basic concepts in 
every programming language.

BR
Marcin Kuszczak
(aarti_pl)