any news on const/invariant?

[Walter Bright]

0ffh wrote:
> Actually, when it comes to array declaration style, I wouldn't care if the
> old style was dropped in D. The new one works fine (for me), and there are
> some good arguments for having just OWTDI.

For new code, there isn't much point to using the C style array 
declarations. But when you're translating a big chunk of C code, it's a 
time and bug saver. Converting the array declarations from C style to D 
style is surprisingly error prone and rather tedious. It cannot be 
automated with simple string editors.