Please stop polluting D 2.0 with C/C++ programmer assumptions.

[Dan]

Walter Bright Wrote:

> Bill Baxter wrote:
> > But I don't understand the logic of 3)"don't assume C++ folks want D to 
> > look like C++" and 2)"make suffix const the only way [like C++]".  It 
> > seems like a mild contradiction.
> 
> It's not possible to design a language that is free of conflicting goals :-)

Read again.  It's not a contradiction.
No other opinions on this subject.  I didn't read it.  I'm just passing through.