"Phango" container classes

[Janice Caron]

On 10/2/07, Lars Ivar Igesund <larsivar at igesund.net> wrote:
> As it is, I
> would expect most (if not all) to want Tango's runtime ahead of Phobos'
> given compatible interfaces.

Well certainly not "all", because "all" includes me.

You have to realise, a lot of people, myself included, adopt the
philosophy "If an engine ain't broke, don't fix it". If there is /no
need/ to replace the runtime (which there isn't), then I'm not going
to do it, because what I have right now works just fine, so I'm not
going to risk breaking anything by changing it.

On the other hand, I'd have no problems with just importing a module
to get me lots of cool new classes.