patched phobos and phobos_ext

[Vladimir Panteleev]

On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:30:38 +0300, UB <ugis.baumanis at gmail.com> wrote:

> == Quote from Vladimir Panteleev (thecybershadow at gmail.com)'s article
>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:23:53 +0300, UB <ugis.baumanis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Are here phobos users, or people are moving mostly toward Tango? Any opinions?
>> I tend to use Phobos unless I need a feature of Tango. I still have a few pet
> peeves with Tango (mainly the neverending import clauses, the "you must create an
> object for everything" ideology and generally the involved verbosity).
>
> What are these features used of Tango?
> Are they deep related to Tango, or could be used separately with Phobos?

I use the net package. I would love to see something like 
string httpGet(string url, string[string] extraHeaders = null);
string httpPost(string url, void[] data, string[string] extraHeaders = null);

(and, possibly, functions/classes that these functions wrap around with more control)

Another thing was that it had more complete coverage of the Win32 API, but since I discovered the WindowsAPI[1] bindings package, that's hardly an issue.

I think that's about it. One thing I do love about Tango, though, is that they're much faster at fixing bugs than Phobos :D

[1] http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/WindowsApi

-- 
Best regards,
 Vladimir                          mailto:thecybershadow at gmail.com