named parameters to functions
Don Clugston
dac at nospam.com.au
Fri Oct 12 07:39:25 PDT 2007
Zola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm amazed by some things D does have,
> Except I'm puzzled by this one one gaping hole in D.
>
> It's something I've been pissed off about C++ for 10 years now:
> Named parameters to functions.
>
> window* w = new_window("alert box", movable=false);
My suspicion is that this would make name lookup really horrible.
What does this code do?
--
bool movable;
window* w = new_window("alert box", movable=false);
--
>
> We can almost do this in C++ today with boost.parameter and I hate it so much that I refuse to use it, because the only way to do so is by polluting your namespace.
>
> I'm really surprised to see that D doesn't have this super important feature.
> It redefines and simplifies a whole world of class design.. for user interfaces especially.
>
> If D included this, I think it would be the tipping point to really getting me into D, and making a serious library for it.
>
> Please.
>
> - Z
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list