alternative D frontends should have a LLVM backend
Clay Smith
clayasaurus at gmail.com
Mon Oct 29 13:17:27 PDT 2007
BLS wrote:
> LLVM advantages are well known, but IMO alternative D Frontends like DIL
> should have a LLVM backend because this will open us a backdoor to DOT
> NET via MSIL
> Quote :
> LLVM now has a new MSIL backend. llc -march=msil will now turn LLVM into
> MSIL (".net") bytecode. This is still fairly early development with a
> number of limitations.
> End Quote
> Problems? Yes indeed ...
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-March/008244.html
>
> Your opinion ?
>
> Bjoern
http://www.dsource.org/projects/llvmdc
Check it out.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list