structs, classes, interfaces - Part III, Solution

[Ben Hinkle]

> > Internally a pointer to an interface would actually be a struct
> > containing the vtable and a pointer to the object which would be a
> > tiny bit more costly than a class reference.
> 
> I've wanted this for a LONG time. It would allow all sorts of fun things 
> to implement an interface (functions, structs, maybe even basic types). Alas 
> it would break COM or require a totally incompatible special case. (I darn 
> to heck whoever defined the COM standard that way!)

This is the same as what I've been calling "typed pointers" in Cx: http://tinycx.sourceforge.net/typeptr.html. You can add methods to builtin types like "double" or "int". Cx is temporarily on the back burner so there are no downloads available but I hope to return to it soon.

-Ben