Properties and macros on WalterAndrei.pdf.
Robert Fraser
fraserofthenight at gmail.com
Wed Sep 5 13:50:16 PDT 2007
Julio César Carrascal Urquijo Wrote:
> Regarding slides 9 through 11 of WalterAndrei.pdf (Uniform Function Call
> Syntax) would we be allowed to add properties to a class? For example:
>
> void foo(Matrix m, char[] value)
> {
> // ...
> }
> char[] foo(Matrix m)
> {
> // ...
> }
>
> m.foo = "parrot";
> writefln("It's a dead %s.", m.foo); //-> It's a dead parrot.
>
>
> Now on pages 45 - 51 on AST Macros... Would it be possible to declare a
> macro as a static member of a class or struct? Example:
>
> struct Matrix
> {
> macro foo(e) { e = 3; }
> }
>
> Matrix.foo(q); // I didn't pick the names. Don't blame me for it. ;)
>
> Thanks
I'm guessing probably not, as the current array-member-function syntax requires parens. I don't think it would make lookup _much_ harder, though.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list