Two "standard" libraries???

[Jascha Wetzel]

BLS wrote:
> Carsten Sørensen schrieb:
>> What I would like to see is tango being adopted as _the_ standard
>> library for D. Clean slate. Possibly with a phobos compatibility layer.
>> If that's not possible, simply drop phobos and force people to use to
>> use tango with D 3.0. 
> 
> Drop Phobos. Vote++.
> Rationale-
> PRO Tango :
> 1) Tango is community driven (more or less) Phobos is not.
> 2) Tango's functionality grows with every litte update, Phobos is at a 
> stand still.
> 
> Pro Phobos :
> 1) Is allways up to date with the latest D compiler.
> 
> 
> General :
> 1) The D library situation is still lousy.  Standard-GUI, Database, DTL, 
> communication  ... So having two "standard libraries" is a complete 
> waste of time and human resourses.
> Bjoern

drop phobos? no way!
what's wrong with joining the runtime libs?

import std.string;
import tango.io.FilePath;

=> everybody happy