Two "standard" libraries???

[Ender KaShae]

Jascha Wetzel Wrote:

> BLS wrote:
> > Carsten Sørensen schrieb:
> >> What I would like to see is tango being adopted as _the_ standard
> >> library for D. Clean slate. Possibly with a phobos compatibility layer.
> >> If that's not possible, simply drop phobos and force people to use to
> >> use tango with D 3.0. 
> > 
> > Drop Phobos. Vote++.
> > Rationale-
> > PRO Tango :
> > 1) Tango is community driven (more or less) Phobos is not.
> > 2) Tango's functionality grows with every litte update, Phobos is at a 
> > stand still.
> > 
> > Pro Phobos :
> > 1) Is allways up to date with the latest D compiler.
> > 
> > 
> > General :
> > 1) The D library situation is still lousy.  Standard-GUI, Database, DTL, 
> > communication  ... So having two "standard libraries" is a complete 
> > waste of time and human resourses.
> > Bjoern
> 
> drop phobos? no way!
> what's wrong with joining the runtime libs?
> 
> import std.string;
> import tango.io.FilePath;
> 
> => everybody happy

that is my personal opinion