Proposal: Static Invariant (C++ concept in D)

[Alexander Panek]

davidl wrote:
> You didn't raise a valid point. And actually it's you who choose the name.

I pointed out - as Bill Baxter did here in the newsgroup -, that your 
proposal is rendered useless. "static in" would only add syntactic sugar 
  for a feature that is rather easy to implement in D already.

I pointed out the name, because I thought /if/ there should be a kind of 
compile time constraint, "static variadic" would be the most fitting 
phrase - as opposed to  "static in", which you kept repeating in the 
beginning of our "discussion".