Right now, what's the most important for the success and adoption of D?

[Matti Niemenmaa]

Jascha Wetzel wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
>> 1. A solid debugging environment
> 
> can you elaborate on what ddbg should improve on it's share of the
> debugging environment?

Platform support is one thing. Of course, one can use gdb, but I'd prefer
something with better D support---and there's the fact that I'm used to ddbg
from the Windows side.

I realize what I'm saying and that you're probably aware of this already, but
from my point of view it's the only important thing where ddbg can improve.

-- 
E-mail address: matti.niemenmaa+news, domain is iki (DOT) fi