Right now, what's the most important for the success and adoption of D?

Jarrett Billingsley kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com
Sun Sep 30 09:28:43 PDT 2007


"Bruce Adams" <tortoise_74 at yeah.who.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:fdmmfq$28di$1 at digitalmars.com...

> I don't get what the problem is. C++ must have had to solve the same 
> problem long ago. Surely its just a matter of requiring libraries to 
> exposes a particular interface for the runtime to hook into?
> It seems like something too obvious to have been omitted from the D 
> language specification.

C++ has neither a GC (well, I guess it might get one in 0x but..) nor 
TypeInfo the way D has it.  Neither problem exists in C++, so it never was a 
problem there to begin with. 





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list