Ary Borenszweig pisze:
...
> I suggest marking properties as such like this:
>
> getter Type property() {
> // ...
> }
>
> setter void property() {
> // ...
> }
>
...
> What do you think?
Good rationale.
I just think that one keyword instead of setter/getter would be just
enough. E.g 'property'.
BR
Marcin Kuszczak