Auto-invariance (WAS: const )

[Steven Schveighoffer]

"Sean Kelly" wrote
>
> No one liked this idea, huh? :-)  One thought for reducing the number of
> permutations was to only permute on "in" parameters.  Explicitly specified
> "const" or "invariant" parameters are left as-is.  Another possible 
> reduction
> would be to only do this for template functions, though this would be
> somewhat of an odd special case.

This would help I think:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1961

-Steve