Fully transitive const is not necessary
Walter Bright
newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Tue Apr 1 17:42:53 PDT 2008
Craig Black wrote:
> Walter/Andrei are under the impression that transitive const is
> necessary for multiprogramming, but they have not presented a detailed
> explanation about why it is necessary. It sounds like a more detailed
> explanation of the merits of transitive const from Walter/Andrei would
> help here.
That'll all come when we get the details worked out on how D will
support multiprogramming. It's an ongoing effort, and current events are
leading us to believe that this is getting extremely important.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list