Forums suffering Priority Inversion with Livelock
Daniel
murpsoft at hotmail.com
Fri Apr 4 02:48:36 PDT 2008
downs Wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
> > I don't mean to rain on anyone's parade, but I'm noticing a livelock priority inversion in the forums. Everyone's spending months arguing about constness, when there are clear, simple, and higher priority issues to resolve.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > 1) The x86-32 platform is obsolete, and D still can't run x86-64, and only supports SSE if you hand code it in assembler. One step away from being targetted to 16-bit x286. x86-64 has been out for a 5 years now.
>
> I've managed to make autovectorization (automatic SSE generation from loops) work in a highly experimental version of GDC 4.2.3, with lots of help from IRC.
>
> I'll post a patch in a while, with HUGE "experimental" stickers (want to get the stress test results first), but it works in principle.
>
> Also, all of tools should in theory work on 64-bit (even the assembler stuff) - I'll test it in a few days on a new box I'm putting together.
>
> GDC also generates faster code than DMD in many cases :)
>
> --feep
Cool stuff, downs. Looks like it'll be the GDC then for all my future language-based programming. Now I just need to throw together another x86-64 Linux again somewhere.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list