Isn't "transitive" the wrong word?
Jesse Phillips
jessekphillips at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 15:05:59 PDT 2008
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:57:43 +0100, Janice Caron wrote:
> On 04/04/2008, Jesse Phillips <jessekphillips at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Except when you look at the definition of transitive in the dictionary,
>> "having or containing an object required to complete the meaning."
>> Thus if we have a transitive const then all things inside it must also
>> be const.
>
> What dictionary are you reading? It doesn't say that in Chambers or
> Merriam-Websters.
>
> M-W says
> 1 : characterized by having or containing a direct object <a
> transitive verb> <a transitive construction>
> 2 : being or relating to a relation with the property that if the
> relation holds between a first element and a second and between the
> second element and a third, it holds between the first and third
> elements <equality is a transitive relation>
> 3 : of, relating to, or characterized by transition
>
>
>> I see no reason to make changes.
>
> Given that transitive isn't a keyword, there are no changes to make. (I
> was just being nitpicky.)
>
> That said, I do suspect that using odd words in discussion or articles
> or whatever doesn't help lessen confusion.
Well, I got it out of my Merriam-Websters and I don't think anyone is
really mixing up the meaning of transitive with respect to D. But anyway
it seams to have brought out a good idea, and I'm interested to see
Walters input on it.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list