Grafting Functional Support on Top of an Imperative Language
Unknown W. Brackets
unknown at simplemachines.org
Fri Apr 4 17:14:36 PDT 2008
Surely there would be some sort of (detectable) cast or some such to
"escape" a pure function for debugging? Or maybe this just plain ol'
relies on running a debugger (not so much fun.)
-[Unknown]
Jason House wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
>> P. 31: >writeln(i);<
>>
>> Can you put (temporary) debugging writeln/putr inside a pure function?
>
> That's always bothered me about this stuff. I don't want to lose
> debugging/logging ability!
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list