Extending "scope"

[Brian White]

>> What do others think about extending "scope" to allow it to be applied to 
>> member data?  They would by default be set to "null" but have the 
>> requirement that they must be set exactly once in the constructor and 
>> nowhere else.  They would also be deleted automatically during the 
>> destructor.
> 
> I think you're the 318th person to suggest this.  I might be talking out of 
> you-know-where but I think I remember Walter mentioning that this is in the 
> cards for D2. 

Well...  I'm fairly new here.  :-)

If it's in the cards for D2, it's not currently implemented there since 
that's the compiler I'm using.

I forgot to mention that of course only scope classes could have scope 
members, but I think that's fairly obvious.

-- Brian