On the richness of C++
Georg Wrede
georg at nospam.org
Thu Apr 10 08:37:29 PDT 2008
I read
http://www.nwcpp.org/Downloads/2007/redcode_-_updated.pdf
and upon reading it I got thinking of something else. Those familiar
with C++ (aren't we all?) probably sometimes come across things that
somebody has done in C++ that are simply stunning. Things that one would
have thought would need a new language, or maybe just be impossible to
implement at all. I know I have. (A lot of Boost stuff is like that,
originally the STL got me breathless, but there's a lot that's not
template related, too.)
Is it just paranoia, or is C++ still more flexible and expressive than D?
Are there still things you can do in C++ that are impossible or too
awkward to do in D?
Of course, I don't mean Obfuscated C(++). While that definitely
demonstrates the unfathomable agility of the language, I'm only talking
about serious, non-juvenile stuff.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list