Removing D embedded in HTML feature

[Bill Baxter]

Robert Fraser wrote:
> Jim Hewes wrote:
>> 4. I didn't suggest UML. I just want to add vector diagrams, drawings, 
>> flowcharts, links and other forms of visual documentation. I want to 
>> edit them and keep them together with the source. Sure I can use 
>> Doxygen to add @param and @returns in the source. But then when I look 
>> at the source, I see the ugly @param and @returns. If I want to see 
>> nice formatting, I need to go look at the HTML output which is whole 
>> separate thing. And then when I'm looking at the HTML output in the 
>> browser, I can't edit code there. Why can't it be together?
> 
> That's one of the goals of DDoc -- to be (generally) human-readable 
> without a lot of formatting. Not sure how successful it is at that, but 
> I think it's a step up from Doxygen and Javadoc:
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ddoc.html

ReST and NaturalDocs contain some nice ideas for human-readable docs.

http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
http://www.naturaldocs.org/

The $(...) macros in DDoc aren't particularly human-friendly in my opinion.

--bb