Yet another MRV proposal!

[downs]

downs wrote:
> Well, I see two ways around that ..
> 
> the first is "with (test()) { use a and b here; }"
> 
> the second is to allow mixins to work on non-templates, so you could mixin test() to get a and b in the current scope.
> 
> the third is
Three, three ways. Our three ways of MRV are with, mixin and

> to use some type of struct variable holder using pointers, that allows assignment from same-layout other-type structs

the fourth is .. I'll come in again.

:hasty exit: