Library standardization

[Bill Baxter]

Hans W. Uhlig wrote:

>> Yeah, so. The generated di files already do most of what is asked, 
>> sure it isn't very human readable and what ever other problems that 
>> come with inline code. If these files aren't doing enough, request 
>> correction in di generation, not an entirely new useless file.
> 
> If indentation and such are such a problem, just run it through a pretty 
> printer.

The compiler has a feature to generate .di files.  Why would you not 
want it to do that job nicely?  Yeh, your suggestion is an ok 
work-around but the right solution is to just improve the built-in .di 
generator.  All I'm talking about is adding some white space appropriately.

I also wouldn't say making such changes should be a very high priority. 
  It's just one of those bazillion bits of polishing that remains to be 
done, but should be done, some day.

--bb