Handling constructive criticism

[Bruno Medeiros]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> etc.  That said, the only compelling reasons for me to upgrade to 2.0 are
> struct ctors and overload groups (or whatever they're called).  The const
> syntax is a dis-incentive, as is the dual meaning of enum, dynamic
> closures, etc.  They all complicate the syntax in undesirable ways or
> cause problems while attempting to solve solutions I don't need solved
> for the work I do.  

Huh? I understand the issues with const and enum, but what's the problem 
with dynamic closures?


-- 
Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D