Sharing in D

[Walter Bright]

superdan wrote:
> i grok that. my problem is that your shared doesn't help me with
> writing good code in that case. ++x is just wrong for shared x. i'd
> rather have it disabled or somethin'.

Actually, the current plan is that ++ would be disabled for shared 
lvalues. Reads and writes to them would be done through intrinsic 
functions, which would make clear the order in which reads and writes 
are done.

Sure, it won't be pretty, but there won't be any ambiguity of the order 
in which things happen.