Tango vs Phobos

[Don]

Robert Fraser wrote:
> Sean Kelly Wrote:
> 
>> == Quote from Moritz Warning (moritzwarning at web.de)'s article
>>> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:29:45 +0400, Denis Koroskin wrote:
>>>> The biggest issue is diffent Tango and Phobos runtime implementation, I
>>>> think.
>>>> I didn't find any bugzilla reports on this subject, though. :(
>>> I haven't taken a look at those runtime implementation differences,
>>> but I wonder why there are no activities to solve this issue.
>>> It makes it look like the participants are playing the golden throne
>>> game...
>> Unfortunately, for this to be resolved it requires cooperation from both
>> sides.  It takes two to Tango, as they say (sorry, bad joke).
>>
>>
>> Sean
> 
> I see the D community heading for a split. One side will be D1 (hopefully a D 1.5) +tango, and the other side will be D2+phobos.  I don't think of this as a bad thing nessescarily, just two different directions.

I desperately hope not. I'm strongly active in both camps.
I'm heartily sick of this situation. std.math and tango.math.Math/ 
tango.math.IEEE are now a cut and paste of each other, barring a very 
small number of lines. I want a single code base, but I'm not sure what 
more I can do.