Standardization of D
JMNorris
nospam at nospam.com
Sun Feb 3 01:15:01 PST 2008
"Bruce Adams" <tortoise_74 at yeah.who.co.uk> wrote in
news:op.t5u0eef7xikks4 at starquake.cybernetics:
> Design by comittee is reknowned for its speed even when there is
> concensus. Look at how long it took to get ISO C++ and they daren't
> put a definite year
> to C++0x. It was probably a little optimistic putting a 0 there.
Maybe they're hoping to finish in time to have a C++0x10? If so, they may
not make it. :-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list