Standard Library Concerns (Phobos / Tango)

[Kris]

"Derek Parnell" <derek at psych.ward> wrote in ...
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:18:42 -0500, kris wrote:
>
>> Derek Parnell Wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Of course, it would even better if developers could use both libraries 
>>> in
>>> the same application (without a Tangobos layer).
>>
>> Hiya Derek
>>
>> Just wanted to clarify that the Tangobos package (from Gregor) is not a
>> 'layer' ...
>
> Thanks Kris. I was not aware of that. I assumed that it was a wrapper
> around Tango that made it look like Phobos.
>
>> Hope this helps to clarify things?
>
> It sort of does, but it seems that we now have the 'best of both worlds'
> with Tangobos, so what will be coming from DigitalMars? Will we then have
> four options: Tango, Tangobos, 'classic' Phobos and 'modern' Phobos?


To hazard a guess, perhaps this was the motivation for that recent poll?