Why can't we define re-assignable const reference variable?
Derek Parnell
derek at psych.ward
Tue Feb 19 12:54:32 PST 2008
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:29:18 +0000, Janice Caron wrote:
>> Don't know whether that's the case or not currently.
>
> I've been using it for a while now, and on the whole I find it very
> simple, elegant, and obvious.
So long as one isn't trying to do things that Walter disagrees with.
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list