stability
Janice Caron
caron800 at googlemail.com
Mon Feb 25 09:07:22 PST 2008
On 25/02/2008, Alexander Panek <alexander.panek at brainsware.org> wrote:
> > I think you're confusing "D1 spec being stable" with "D1 spec being
> > incomplete".
On the contrary, I am saying nothing whatsoever about D1. You could
argue that it has a spec; you could argue that it doesn't - frankly, I
don't care either way.
What I /am/ saying though, is that D2 does /not/ have a spec, and
therefore one cannot make any claims that the D2 compiler is, or is
not, "behaving correctly", and therefore cannot use that as a basis to
decide what should or should not be backported to D1.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list