tupleof specification

[Jarrett Billingsley]

"Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:fpvjmp$4k7$1 at digitalmars.com...

> Either mark it as wontfix/invalid or backport the change from D2.

And I just thought of a third possibility: in D1, change the behavior of the 
compiler (and the spec to match!) so that .tupleof just gives a tuple of 
public members.  Doesn't break backwards compatibility but makes it actually 
possible to use introspection on aggregates with private/protected members 
rather than just giving an error.