stability

[Walter Bright]

Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> Walter Bright, el 24 de febrero a las 21:58 me escribiste:
>> John Reimer wrote:
>>> In the case of gcc, the other way to look at the bug count (4265) is to realize that the 
>>> number is the combined sum of four front ends (C, C++, Objective C, GNAT) and two 
>>> processor IS targets (32 bit and 64 bit).  At least that is what I gathered from the 
>>> link. So I think it's just a little unfair to compare dmd's bug count directly to gcc's, 
>>> although I understand the point you were trying to make. :)
>> Bug count is an uninformative measure of quality anyway.
> 
> I agree, that's why I'm still wondering why did you mention it in the
> discussion :)

To illustrate my point!