tupleof specification
Bill Baxter
dnewsgroup at billbaxter.com
Thu Feb 28 16:17:30 PST 2008
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:fpvjmp$4k7$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> .tupleof is ill-specified in D1 and D2. It does not mention:
>>
>> 1) What happens when it encounters anonymous nested structs and unions
>> 2) What happens when it encounters private or protected members
>>
>> Bug 1223 (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1223) was reported
>> last May. It has not yet been resolved. D2 "changed" the behavior of
>> tupleof in regards to private/protected members (notice it's only 2 days
>> after the comment Andrei made on this bug) but this change has still not
>> been reflected in the spec.
>>
>> I request that the behavior in these two cases (and indeed, any other
>> special cases that you can think of) be clarified in both the D1 and D2
>> specs. I also request that the bug in the bugzilla be addressed, since it
>> was reported for D1 but was never addressed. Either mark it as
>> wontfix/invalid or backport the change from D2.
>
> I mean, I know how important _file extensions_ are, but could I get some
> kind of response on this?
Ok. I'll shut up already. :)
Walter, if you were thinking to respond to another one of my inane posts
about file extensions -- don't. Respond to Jarret here instead. Please.
--bb
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list