Sean Kelly wrote:
> I don't suppose the use of 'enum' in this context has had any impact on
> named enumerations? ie. We still cannot have a named enum which
> contains strings, correct?
You can do named enums with strings now.
> Also, are traditional unnamed enums still
> legal?
Yes.
> enum
> {
> a, b, c
> }
>
> enum : long
> {
> d, e, f
> }