const=readonly invariant=const
Sascha Katzner
sorry.no at spam.invalid
Fri Jan 4 11:13:48 PST 2008
Daniel919 wrote:
> But then it would be easier if we change:
> const to readonly
> invariant to const
I like this idea to exchange the meaning of const and invariant *VERY*
much. Personally I prefer "invariant" to "readonly", but this is negligible.
The very nice side effect of this change would be, that we could kick
the recent enum changes (which practically nobody likes *eg*), in favor
to the much more intuitive and backward compatible "const PI = 3.14"
form for manifest constants.
LLAP,
Sascha Katzner
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list