Remove complex and imaginary types?

[Russell Lewis]

Georg Wrede wrote:
> Of course, the fewness of keywords can be perceived as a measure of good 
> language design. But decreasing the number of keywords artificially 
> doesn't make any language better.
> 
> "Have as few keywords as practical, but NO fewer than that!"

I wrote a programming language that used only 26 keywords: a,b,c,d...

Of course, each keyword had a subtly different meaning depending on its 
context...  ;)