Remove complex and imaginary types?

[renoX]

Janice Caron a écrit :
> On 1/12/08, renoX <renosky at free.fr> wrote:
>> I'm thinking about the underscore '_': 5.8f_km would be replaced by
>> km(5.8f),
> 
> Why not the asterisk? Oh wait! - We already /have/ that functionality!
> 
>     5.8f*km
> 
> is replaced by
> 
>     km.opMul_r(5.8f);
> 
> Seems to me that nothing new is needed.

Because
1) when we write physic equation we don't write "5.0 x km" (x being the 
multiplication sign) but "5.0 km" so it would be nice if the language 
supported a way to make similar notations.

2) this could makes unneeded additional multiplication.

3) When you write "5km" you don't mean 5 * 1km but km(5), but sure most 
of the time it's the same..

Regards,
renoX