Polishing D - Interoptability

[Unknown W. Brackets]

Thanks.  It was just an idea I've had for a long time, I figured I'd throw into the end of the document as an example.  I'm glad you think it's a good idea.

Your point about stderr is a good one, and something I missed.  This is important mainly on Linux.  I mentioned the other somewhere.

For management, I'm really talking about D itself.  I'm mostly unconcerned about how people use D, as much as how D itself is developed and presented to them - I think that's what needs work, personally.

-[Unknown]


Bjoern Wrote:
> But for the moment just 2 little things :
> 1- make compiler output more consistent, in other words, easier to 
> parse. (same is valid for profiler output)
> 2- write errors to stderr
> 
> Regarding source-code-management/QA etc. :
> IMO this should be essential part of an D IDE. Simply having support for 
> current systems like CVS/SVN,Mercurial, .. is not good enough.
> 
> Excellent article Unknown !
> Bjoern
>